Skip to main content
European Commission logo
français français
CORDIS - Résultats de la recherche de l’UE
CORDIS
CORDIS Web 30th anniversary CORDIS Web 30th anniversary

Policy, Expertise, and Trust in Action

Description du projet

La confiance du public dans l’opinion des experts mise à l’épreuve

La confiance est le fondement de nos interactions sociales. Des philosophes, des spécialistes des sciences sociales et naturelles, des experts en politiques, des éthiciens, des psychologues, des spécialistes des médias et des organisations de la société civile se réuniront pour enquêter sur la nature et les conditions de la confiance du public. Le projet PEriTiA, financé par l’UE, examinera le rôle de la science dans la prise de décision politique et les conditions dans lesquelles les gens devraient avoir confiance et s’appuyer sur l’opinion d’experts qui façonne l’opinion publique. L’hypothèse clé, explorée conceptuellement et testée empiriquement, est que les facteurs affectifs et normatifs jouent un rôle central dans les décisions de confiance, même dans les cas où les jugements de fiabilité peuvent sembler fondés sur des considérations épistémiques, telles que la réputation professionnelle, la fiabilité et l’objectivité. Le projet utilisera le changement climatique et la science du climat comme cas d’étude.

Objectif

Many policy decisions in contemporary knowledge-based forms of governance are driven by advice, evidence and data provided by experts from diverse arenas. In democratic societies, trust in the provenance and justification of policy measures are essential for their implementation. The rise of populist politics with its anti-elitist mantra has brought the trustworthiness of experts and their areas of expertise into question. PEriTiA brings together philosophers, social and natural scientists, policy experts, ethicists, psychologists, media specialists and civil society organisations to conduct a comprehensive multi-disciplinary investigation of trust in and the trustworthiness of policy related expert opinion. The investigation is carried out in three - theoretical, empirical and ameliorative – phases with the goal of illuminating a topic that has been the subject of much political commentary and media debate in recent years. The key hypothesis explored conceptually and tested empirically is that affective and normative factors play a central role in decisions to trust, even in cases where judgements of trustworthiness may seem to be grounded in epistemic considerations, such as professional reputation, reliability and objectivity. The most ambitious feature of the current project is the application of its theoretical and empirical findings to active attempts at establishing trust, where warranted, between the general public and actors with a central role in the decision-making processes of governance. Our ultimate aim is to provide tools and discover indicators which can be used in measuring and establishing the trustworthiness of the agents involved in social and political decision making. The use of climate change and climate science as a test case in exploring the social, ethical and psychological indicators of trustworthiness is expected to help to construct trust-enhancing narratives regarding the role of science in governance.

Appel à propositions

H2020-SC6-GOVERNANCE-2018-2019-2020

Voir d’autres projets de cet appel

Sous appel

H2020-SC6-GOVERNANCE-2019

Coordinateur

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN, NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, DUBLIN
Contribution nette de l'UE
€ 951 401,25
Adresse
BELFIELD
4 Dublin
Irlande

Voir sur la carte

Région
Ireland Eastern and Midland Dublin
Type d’activité
Higher or Secondary Education Establishments
Liens
Coût total
€ 951 401,25

Participants (10)